Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual

Turkmenistan
4.54 % change on previous year
in 2023
Zimbabwe
4.73 % change on previous year
in 2023
Turkmenistan rank
30th
Zimbabwe rank
28th

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual over time

  • Turkmenistan
  • Zimbabwe
-40-200204060196219922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 4.73 % change on previous year against 4.54 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.19 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Turkmenistan ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 28th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Turkmenistan averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turkmenistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 11.45 % change on previous year 1.99 % change on previous year 9.46 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2000s 21.86 % change on previous year 4.34 % change on previous year 17.52 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2010s 3.36 % change on previous year 4.12 % change on previous year 0.7632 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0463 % change on previous year 3.11 % change on previous year 3.06 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual, Turkmenistan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 4.73 % change on previous year against 4.54 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual between Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe?
0.19 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual?
Turkmenistan ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/turkmenistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/turkmenistan/zimbabwe/">Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 12,769 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.