Angola vs Saudi Arabia: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

Angola
0 kt per person
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Angola rank
52nd
Saudi Arabia rank
51st

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • Angola
  • Saudi Arabia
00000196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Angola, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 52nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 51st of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Angola
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Angola
1980s 0 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Saudi Arabia
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Saudi Arabia
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Saudi Arabia
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Angola
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Angola or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Angola and Saudi Arabia?
0 kt per person, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Saudi Arabia rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
Angola ranks 52nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 51st of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Saudi Arabia: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/angola/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/angola/saudi-arabia/">Angola vs Saudi Arabia: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.