Belarus vs Uruguay: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Belarus
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
147th
Uruguay rank
146th

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Belarus
  • Uruguay
0000196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 147th and Uruguay ranks 146th of 162 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Belarus or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Belarus and Uruguay?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Belarus ranks 147th and Uruguay ranks 146th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Uruguay: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/uruguay/">Belarus vs Uruguay: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.