Belgium vs Namibia: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Belgium
0.0006 kt per square kilometre
in 2022
Namibia
0.0005 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
84th
Namibia rank
87th

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Belgium
  • Namibia
0000.001196119922023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0.0006 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.

Belgium ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 87th of 162 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Belgium or Namibia?
Belgium, at 0.0006 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2022.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Belgium and Namibia?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Namibia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Belgium and Namibia rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Belgium ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 87th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Namibia: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belgium/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belgium/namibia/">Belgium vs Namibia: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.