Brazil vs Congo: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Brazil
0.0002 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.0002 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
110th
Congo rank
107th

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Brazil
  • Congo
0000196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0002 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 110th and Congo ranks 107th of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Brazil or Congo?
Congo, at 0.0002 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Brazil and Congo?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Congo rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Brazil ranks 110th and Congo ranks 107th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Congo: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/brazil/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/brazil/congo-rep/">Brazil vs Congo: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.