Canada vs Iceland: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Canada
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
160th
Iceland rank
157th

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Canada
  • Iceland
000000196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 7.2 times Canada's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 160th and Iceland ranks 157th of 162 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Canada or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Canada and Iceland?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Iceland rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Canada ranks 160th and Iceland ranks 157th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Iceland: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/canada/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/canada/iceland/">Canada vs Iceland: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.