Ecuador vs Finland: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
154th
Finland rank
156th

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Finland
000000196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 2.2 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 154th and Finland ranks 156th of 162 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Ecuador or Finland?
Ecuador, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Ecuador and Finland?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Finland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Finland rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Ecuador ranks 154th and Finland ranks 156th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Finland: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/finland/">Ecuador vs Finland: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.