Ecuador vs Latvia: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
154th
Latvia rank
152nd

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Latvia
000000196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 154th and Latvia ranks 152nd of 162 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Ecuador or Latvia?
Latvia, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Ecuador and Latvia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Ecuador ranks 154th and Latvia ranks 152nd of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Latvia: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/">Ecuador vs Latvia: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.