Equatorial Guinea vs New Zealand: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Equatorial Guinea
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
129th
New Zealand rank
132nd

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • New Zealand
00.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.4 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 129th and New Zealand ranks 132nd of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Equatorial Guinea or New Zealand?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Equatorial Guinea and New Zealand?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and New Zealand rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 129th and New Zealand ranks 132nd of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs New Zealand: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/new-zealand/">Equatorial Guinea vs New Zealand: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.