Estonia vs Uruguay: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Estonia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
148th
Uruguay rank
146th

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Estonia
  • Uruguay
0000196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Uruguay ahead.

Estonia ranks 148th and Uruguay ranks 146th of 162 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Estonia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Estonia and Uruguay?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Uruguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Uruguay rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Estonia ranks 148th and Uruguay ranks 146th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Uruguay: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/estonia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/estonia/uruguay/">Estonia vs Uruguay: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.