Finland vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Finland
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
156th
Papua New Guinea rank
159th

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Finland
  • Papua New Guinea
0000196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 5.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 156th and Papua New Guinea ranks 159th of 162 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Finland or Papua New Guinea?
Finland, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Finland and Papua New Guinea?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Finland and Papua New Guinea rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Finland ranks 156th and Papua New Guinea ranks 159th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/finland/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/finland/papua-new-guinea/">Finland vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.