Luxembourg vs Namibia: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Luxembourg
0.0005 kt per square kilometre
in 2022
Namibia
0.0005 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Luxembourg rank
88th
Namibia rank
87th

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Namibia
0000.001196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0005 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 88th and Namibia ranks 87th of 162 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Luxembourg or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0005 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in Luxembourg as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Luxembourg and Namibia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Namibia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Luxembourg and Namibia rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Luxembourg ranks 88th and Namibia ranks 87th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Namibia: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/luxembourg/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/luxembourg/namibia/">Luxembourg vs Namibia: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.