Mali vs Turkmenistan: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Mali
0.0016 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0019 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali rank
61st
Turkmenistan rank
59th

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Mali
  • Turkmenistan
-0.006-0.004-0.00200.002196119922023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0.0019 kt per square kilometre against 0.0016 kt per square kilometre in Mali, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.

Mali ranks 61st and Turkmenistan ranks 59th of 162 countries.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2000s -0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2010s -0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0021 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2020s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Mali or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 0.0019 kt per square kilometre against 0.0016 kt per square kilometre in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Mali and Turkmenistan?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Mali and Turkmenistan rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Mali ranks 61st and Turkmenistan ranks 59th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Turkmenistan: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/mali/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/mali/turkmenistan/">Mali vs Turkmenistan: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.