Malta vs South Africa: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Malta
0.001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
0.001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
74th
South Africa rank
72nd

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Malta
  • South Africa
00.0020.0040.006196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.001 kt per square kilometre against 0.001 kt per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 74th and South Africa ranks 72nd of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 5 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0026 kt per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0.0023 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Malta
2020s 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Malta or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.001 kt per square kilometre against 0.001 kt per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Malta and South Africa?
0 kt per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and South Africa rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Malta ranks 74th and South Africa ranks 72nd of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs South Africa: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/malta/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/malta/south-africa/">Malta vs South Africa: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.