Mauritius vs Sierra Leone: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Mauritius
0.0026 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
0.0029 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
51st
Sierra Leone rank
48th

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sierra Leone
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119922023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 0.0029 kt per square kilometre against 0.0026 kt per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 51st and Sierra Leone ranks 48th of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Sierra Leone in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0072 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0077 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0073 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0094 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.009 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0109 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0103 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0027 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Mauritius or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 0.0029 kt per square kilometre against 0.0026 kt per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Mauritius and Sierra Leone?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sierra Leone?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Sierra Leone rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Mauritius ranks 51st and Sierra Leone ranks 48th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sierra Leone: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sierra-leone/">Mauritius vs Sierra Leone: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.