Papua New Guinea vs Palestine: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Papua New Guinea
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
-0.0003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
159th
Palestine rank
162nd

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Palestine
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against -0.0003 kt per square kilometre in Palestine, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Palestine ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 159th and Palestine ranks 162nd of 162 countries.

Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre Palestine
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.004 kt per square kilometre 0.004 kt per square kilometre Palestine
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre Palestine
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Papua New Guinea or Palestine?
Papua New Guinea, at 0 kt per square kilometre against -0.0003 kt per square kilometre in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Papua New Guinea and Palestine?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Palestine?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Palestine rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Papua New Guinea ranks 159th and Palestine ranks 162nd of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Palestine: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/west-bank-and-gaza/">Papua New Guinea vs Palestine: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.