Sao Tome and Principe vs Zambia: Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Sao Tome and Principe
0.0015 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0015 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
64th
Zambia rank
63rd

Meat of goat, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Zambia
00.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0015 kt per square kilometre against 0.0015 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 64th and Zambia ranks 63rd of 162 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Sao Tome and Principe or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0015 kt per square kilometre against 0.0015 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Sao Tome and Principe and Zambia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Zambia rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 64th and Zambia ranks 63rd of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Zambia: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/zambia/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Zambia: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.