Belarus vs Mauritius: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Belarus
-0.7832 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritius
-1.27 % change on previous year
in 2023
Belarus rank
119th
Mauritius rank
122nd

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Belarus
  • Mauritius
-40-200204060196219922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports -0.7832 % change on previous year against -1.27 % change on previous year in Mauritius, a difference of 0.4868 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mauritius ahead.

Belarus ranks 119th and Mauritius ranks 122nd of 191 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s -3.34 % change on previous year -3.45 % change on previous year 0.1071 % change on previous year Belarus
2000s 0.0562 % change on previous year 4.37 % change on previous year 4.31 % change on previous year Mauritius
2010s -1.99 % change on previous year 6.43 % change on previous year 8.42 % change on previous year Mauritius
2020s -3.45 % change on previous year 0.4198 % change on previous year 3.87 % change on previous year Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Mauritius?
Belarus, at -0.7832 % change on previous year against -1.27 % change on previous year in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Mauritius?
0.4868 % change on previous year, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mauritius?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Mauritius rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Belarus ranks 119th and Mauritius ranks 122nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Mauritius: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/belarus/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/belarus/mauritius/">Belarus vs Mauritius: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
221 places, 12,419 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.