How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kiribati?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Kiribati: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Belarus

0.0001 kt per person

in 2023

Kiribati

0.0001 kt per person

in 2023

Belarus rank

22nd

Kiribati rank

23rd

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

Belarus
Kiribati

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0001 kt per person against 0.0001 kt per person in Kiribati, a difference of 0 kt per person.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 22nd and Kiribati ranks 23rd of 149 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Kiribati	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	0 kt per person	Belarus
2000s	0.0001 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	0 kt per person	Belarus
2010s	0.0001 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	0 kt per person	Belarus
2020s	0.0001 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	0 kt per person	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Kiribati?: Belarus, at 0.0001 kt per person against 0.0001 kt per person in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Kiribati?: 0 kt per person, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kiribati?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Kiribati rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Belarus ranks 22nd and Kiribati ranks 23rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Kiribati: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/belarus/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/belarus/kiribati/">Belarus vs Kiribati: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.