How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Caledonia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs New Caledonia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Belarus

0.0001 kt per person

in 2023

New Caledonia

0.0001 kt per person

in 2023

Belarus rank

22nd

New Caledonia rank

19th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

Belarus
New Caledonia

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0001 kt per person against 0.0001 kt per person in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 22nd and New Caledonia ranks 19th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	0 kt per person	Belarus
2000s	0.0001 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	0 kt per person	Belarus
2010s	0.0001 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	0 kt per person	Belarus
2020s	0.0001 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	0 kt per person	New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or New Caledonia?: New Caledonia, at 0.0001 kt per person against 0.0001 kt per person in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and New Caledonia?: 0 kt per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Caledonia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and New Caledonia rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Belarus ranks 22nd and New Caledonia ranks 19th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs New Caledonia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/belarus/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/belarus/new-caledonia/">Belarus vs New Caledonia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.