How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritius?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Mauritius: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Congo

0 kt per person

in 2023

Mauritius

0 kt per person

in 2023

Congo rank

120th

Mauritius rank

119th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

Congo
Mauritius

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 120th and Mauritius ranks 119th of 149 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Mauritius	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Congo
1970s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Congo
1980s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Congo
1990s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Congo
2000s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Congo
2010s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Congo
2020s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Congo or Mauritius?: Mauritius, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Congo and Mauritius?: 0 kt per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritius?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Mauritius rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Congo ranks 120th and Mauritius ranks 119th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mauritius: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/congo-rep/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/congo-rep/mauritius/">Congo vs Mauritius: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.