Latvia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Latvia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0 kt per person
in 2023
Latvia rank
34th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
32nd

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Latvia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0000196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 34th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 32nd of 149 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Latvia
2000s 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Latvia
2010s 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Latvia
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Latvia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Latvia and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 kt per person, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sao Tome and Principe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Latvia ranks 34th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 32nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/latvia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/latvia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Latvia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.