Nauru vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Nauru
0.0001 kt per person
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
0.0001 kt per person
in 2023
Nauru rank
8th
Papua New Guinea rank
11th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Nauru
  • Papua New Guinea
0000196119922023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0.0001 kt per person against 0.0001 kt per person in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.2 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Nauru ranks 8th and Papua New Guinea ranks 11th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Papua New Guinea
1970s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Nauru
2010s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Nauru
2020s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Nauru or Papua New Guinea?
Nauru, at 0.0001 kt per person against 0.0001 kt per person in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Nauru and Papua New Guinea?
0 kt per person, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Papua New Guinea rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Nauru ranks 8th and Papua New Guinea ranks 11th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/naoero/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/naoero/papua-new-guinea/">Nauru vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.