How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nigeria?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Nigeria: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Belarus

0.0026 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Nigeria

0.0027 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

55th

Nigeria rank

54th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

Belarus
Nigeria

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 0.0027 kt per square kilometre against 0.0026 kt per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 55th and Nigeria ranks 54th of 149 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Nigeria	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0042 kt per square kilometre	0.0012 kt per square kilometre	0.003 kt per square kilometre	Belarus
2000s	0.0036 kt per square kilometre	0.0017 kt per square kilometre	0.0019 kt per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	0.0035 kt per square kilometre	0.0021 kt per square kilometre	0.0014 kt per square kilometre	Belarus
2020s	0.0027 kt per square kilometre	0.0026 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Nigeria?: Nigeria, at 0.0027 kt per square kilometre against 0.0026 kt per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Nigeria?: 0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nigeria?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Nigeria rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Belarus ranks 55th and Nigeria ranks 54th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Nigeria: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/nigeria/">Belarus vs Nigeria: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.