How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Ecuador: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Chile

0.0008 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Ecuador

0.0008 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

96th

Ecuador rank

95th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

Chile
Ecuador

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0008 kt per square kilometre against 0.0008 kt per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 96th and Ecuador ranks 95th of 149 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Ecuador	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0003 kt per square kilometre	0.0012 kt per square kilometre	0.0009 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador
1970s	0.0003 kt per square kilometre	0.0019 kt per square kilometre	0.0017 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador
1980s	0.0003 kt per square kilometre	0.0021 kt per square kilometre	0.0018 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador
1990s	0.0004 kt per square kilometre	0.0019 kt per square kilometre	0.0015 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador
2000s	0.0007 kt per square kilometre	0.0012 kt per square kilometre	0.0005 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador
2010s	0.0008 kt per square kilometre	0.0012 kt per square kilometre	0.0004 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador
2020s	0.0008 kt per square kilometre	0.0009 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Chile or Ecuador?: Ecuador, at 0.0008 kt per square kilometre against 0.0008 kt per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Chile and Ecuador?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Chile ranks 96th and Ecuador ranks 95th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Ecuador: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/chile/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/chile/ecuador/">Chile vs Ecuador: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.