Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Congo
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
127th
Equatorial Guinea rank
129th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
0000196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Congo ranks 127th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 129th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Congo, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Congo ranks 127th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 129th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/">Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.