How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Kazakhstan

0 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

0 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan rank

132nd

Namibia rank

131st

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

Kazakhstan
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 132nd and Namibia ranks 131st of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kazakhstan	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2000s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2010s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2020s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Kazakhstan or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Kazakhstan and Namibia?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Kazakhstan ranks 132nd and Namibia ranks 131st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/namibia/">Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.