Latvia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Latvia
0.0013 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0013 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
77th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
78th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Latvia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.006196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0013 kt per square kilometre against 0.0013 kt per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 77th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 78th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0029 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Latvia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Latvia, at 0.0013 kt per square kilometre against 0.0013 kt per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Latvia ranks 77th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 78th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/latvia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/latvia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Latvia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.