South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

South Africa
0.0003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0002 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
116th
Zimbabwe rank
118th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
0000196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 116th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 149 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), South Africa or Zimbabwe?
South Africa, at 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
South Africa ranks 116th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.