How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Barbados?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Barbados: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Barbados

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Australia rank

112th

Barbados rank

109th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

Australia
Barbados

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Australia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Australia ranks 112th and Barbados ranks 109th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Barbados in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	Barbados	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Barbados
1970s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Barbados
1980s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Barbados
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Australia
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Australia
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Barbados
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia or Barbados?: Barbados, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and Barbados?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Barbados?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Barbados rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Australia ranks 112th and Barbados ranks 109th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Barbados: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/barbados/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/barbados/">Australia vs Barbados: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 150 places, 8,127 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.