Belarus vs Nicaragua: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Belarus
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Nicaragua
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Belarus rank
32nd
Nicaragua rank
29th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Belarus
  • Nicaragua
0000196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 32nd and Nicaragua ranks 29th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belarus
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belarus
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belarus
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Nicaragua?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nicaragua?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Nicaragua rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Belarus ranks 32nd and Nicaragua ranks 29th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Nicaragua: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/nicaragua/">Belarus vs Nicaragua: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
150 places, 8,127 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.