How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Namibia?

41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Cuba

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2020

Namibia

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Cuba rank

66th

Namibia rank

69th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

Cuba
Namibia

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 66th and Namibia ranks 69th of 149 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Cuba
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Cuba
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Cuba
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Cuba
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Cuba or Namibia?: Cuba, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Cuba and Namibia?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Namibia?: 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
How do Cuba and Namibia rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Cuba ranks 66th and Namibia ranks 69th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/namibia/">Cuba vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 150 places, 8,127 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.