French Polynesia vs Nepal: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square

French Polynesia
0.2572 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
0.2269 t per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
83rd
Nepal rank
86th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Nepal
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.2572 t per square kilometre against 0.2269 t per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 0.0303 t per square kilometre.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, French Polynesia has been ahead every year.

French Polynesia ranks 83rd and Nepal ranks 86th of 150 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0867 t per square kilometre 0.0257 t per square kilometre 0.061 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
1970s 0.1532 t per square kilometre 0.0336 t per square kilometre 0.1196 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
1980s 0.2319 t per square kilometre 0.0506 t per square kilometre 0.1813 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
1990s 0.3285 t per square kilometre 0.0796 t per square kilometre 0.2488 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 0.315 t per square kilometre 0.1098 t per square kilometre 0.2051 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 0.281 t per square kilometre 0.1508 t per square kilometre 0.1301 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 0.2663 t per square kilometre 0.2259 t per square kilometre 0.0404 t per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per square, French Polynesia or Nepal?
French Polynesia, at 0.2572 t per square kilometre against 0.2269 t per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per square between French Polynesia and Nepal?
0.0303 t per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Nepal rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per square?
French Polynesia ranks 83rd and Nepal ranks 86th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Nepal: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre-2/french-polynesia/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre-2/french-polynesia/nepal/">French Polynesia vs Nepal: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,691 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.