Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual over time
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 18.67 % change on previous year against 2.54 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 16.13 % change on previous year.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 7.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 24 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.21 % change on previous year | 10.62 % change on previous year | 8.41 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 0.6021 % change on previous year | -1.93 % change on previous year | 2.54 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 1980s | 0.1127 % change on previous year | 1.16 % change on previous year | 1.05 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 13.37 % change on previous year | 2.42 % change on previous year | 10.96 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2000s | 4.02 % change on previous year | -6.47 % change on previous year | 10.5 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2010s | 4.35 % change on previous year | 2.6 % change on previous year | 1.75 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2020s | 2.09 % change on previous year | 10.24 % change on previous year | 8.14 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 18.67 % change on previous year against 2.54 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
- 16.13 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.