Latvia vs Mauritius: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual

Latvia
-10.34 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritius
-11.79 % change on previous year
in 2023
Latvia rank
179th
Mauritius rank
182nd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual over time

  • Latvia
  • Mauritius
-50050196219922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports -10.34 % change on previous year against -11.79 % change on previous year in Mauritius, a difference of 1.45 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mauritius ahead.

Latvia ranks 179th and Mauritius ranks 182nd of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s -22.74 % change on previous year 3.38 % change on previous year 26.12 % change on previous year Mauritius
2000s 9.27 % change on previous year -13.57 % change on previous year 22.84 % change on previous year Latvia
2010s 4.16 % change on previous year 9.21 % change on previous year 5.05 % change on previous year Mauritius
2020s -5.83 % change on previous year -3.61 % change on previous year 2.22 % change on previous year Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual, Latvia or Mauritius?
Latvia, at -10.34 % change on previous year against -11.79 % change on previous year in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual between Latvia and Mauritius?
1.45 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual?
Latvia ranks 179th and Mauritius ranks 182nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Mauritius: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/latvia/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/latvia/mauritius/">Latvia vs Mauritius: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,450 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.