Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual over time
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 18.67 % change on previous year against 4.15 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 14.52 % change on previous year.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 4.5 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 26 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.34 % change on previous year | 10.62 % change on previous year | 8.28 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 0.5767 % change on previous year | -1.93 % change on previous year | 2.51 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1980s | 0.3543 % change on previous year | 1.16 % change on previous year | 0.8039 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 1.32 % change on previous year | 2.42 % change on previous year | 1.09 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 3.16 % change on previous year | -6.47 % change on previous year | 9.63 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2010s | 3.76 % change on previous year | 2.6 % change on previous year | 1.16 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2020s | 3.15 % change on previous year | 10.24 % change on previous year | 7.08 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 18.67 % change on previous year against 4.15 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Zimbabwe?
- 14.52 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Zimbabwe?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.