North Macedonia vs Oceania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual

North Macedonia
9.5 % change on previous year
in 2023
Oceania
1.16 % change on previous year
in 2023
North Macedonia rank
10th
Oceania rank
10th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Oceania
-40-2002040196219922023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 9.5 % change on previous year against 1.16 % change on previous year in Oceania, a difference of 8.34 % change on previous year.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 8.2 times Oceania's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Oceania ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 10th and Oceania ranks 10th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 3 and Oceania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Oceania Difference Ahead
1990s -0.7161 % change on previous year -3.07 % change on previous year 2.35 % change on previous year North Macedonia
2000s -2.28 % change on previous year -4.12 % change on previous year 1.84 % change on previous year North Macedonia
2010s -4.1 % change on previous year -1.2 % change on previous year 2.9 % change on previous year Oceania
2020s 4.89 % change on previous year 1.08 % change on previous year 3.81 % change on previous year North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual, North Macedonia or Oceania?
North Macedonia, at 9.5 % change on previous year against 1.16 % change on previous year in Oceania as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual between North Macedonia and Oceania?
8.34 % change on previous year, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Oceania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do North Macedonia and Oceania rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual?
North Macedonia ranks 10th and Oceania ranks 10th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Oceania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/north-macedonia/oceania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/north-macedonia/oceania/">North Macedonia vs Oceania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,450 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.