Bangladesh vs Congo: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

Bangladesh
0 kt per person
in 2023
Congo
0 kt per person
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
128th
Congo rank
125th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Congo
000000196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Bangladesh, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.4 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 128th and Congo ranks 125th of 159 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Congo
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Congo
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Congo
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Congo
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Congo
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Congo
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Bangladesh or Congo?
Congo, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Bangladesh and Congo?
0 kt per person, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Congo rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
Bangladesh ranks 128th and Congo ranks 125th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Congo: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/bangladesh/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/bangladesh/congo-rep/">Bangladesh vs Congo: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.