Botswana vs Cameroon: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

Botswana
0 kt per person
in 2023
Cameroon
0 kt per person
in 2023
Botswana rank
72nd
Cameroon rank
73rd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • Botswana
  • Cameroon
0000196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Cameroon, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.

Botswana ranks 72nd and Cameroon ranks 73rd of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Cameroon in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Cameroon Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana
1970s 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Cameroon
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Cameroon
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Botswana or Cameroon?
Botswana, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Botswana and Cameroon?
0 kt per person, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cameroon?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Cameroon rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
Botswana ranks 72nd and Cameroon ranks 73rd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Cameroon: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/botswana/cameroon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/botswana/cameroon/">Botswana vs Cameroon: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.