Brazil vs Uganda: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

Brazil
0 kt per person
in 2023
Uganda
0 kt per person
in 2023
Brazil rank
71st
Uganda rank
70th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • Brazil
  • Uganda
0000196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Brazil, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 71st and Uganda ranks 70th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Brazil
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Brazil
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Brazil
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Brazil
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Brazil
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Brazil
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Brazil or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Brazil and Uganda?
0 kt per person, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Uganda rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
Brazil ranks 71st and Uganda ranks 70th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Uganda: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/brazil/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/brazil/uganda/">Brazil vs Uganda: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.