Canada vs Ecuador: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

Canada
0 kt per person
in 2023
Ecuador
0 kt per person
in 2023
Canada rank
118th
Ecuador rank
121st

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • Canada
  • Ecuador
00000196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Canada ranks 118th and Ecuador ranks 121st of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Ecuador
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Canada
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Canada or Ecuador?
Canada, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Canada and Ecuador?
0 kt per person, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Ecuador rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
Canada ranks 118th and Ecuador ranks 121st of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Ecuador: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/canada/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/canada/ecuador/">Canada vs Ecuador: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.