Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

Congo
0 kt per person
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0 kt per person
in 2023
Congo rank
125th
Equatorial Guinea rank
122nd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
00000196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 125th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd of 159 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
0 kt per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
Congo ranks 125th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/">Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.