Czechia vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

Czechia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0 kt per person
in 2023
Czechia rank
120th
Equatorial Guinea rank
122nd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • Czechia
  • Equatorial Guinea
00000196119922023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Czechia ranks 120th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd of 159 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Czechia
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Czechia or Equatorial Guinea?
Czechia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Czechia and Equatorial Guinea?
0 kt per person, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Equatorial Guinea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
Czechia ranks 120th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/czechia/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/czechia/equatorial-guinea/">Czechia vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.