Liberia vs Sweden: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

Liberia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Sweden
0 kt per person
in 2023
Liberia rank
94th
Sweden rank
97th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • Liberia
  • Sweden
00000196119922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Liberia ranks 94th and Sweden ranks 97th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Liberia
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Liberia
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Liberia
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Liberia
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Sweden
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Sweden
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Liberia or Sweden?
Liberia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Liberia and Sweden?
0 kt per person, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Sweden rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
Liberia ranks 94th and Sweden ranks 97th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Sweden: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/liberia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/liberia/sweden/">Liberia vs Sweden: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.