Malta vs Mauritius: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

Malta
0 kt per person
in 2023
Mauritius
0 kt per person
in 2023
Malta rank
146th
Mauritius rank
148th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • Malta
  • Mauritius
000000196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.4 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Malta ranks 146th and Mauritius ranks 148th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 5 and Mauritius in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Malta
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Mauritius
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Mauritius
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Malta
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Malta
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Malta
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Malta or Mauritius?
Malta, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Malta and Mauritius?
0 kt per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Mauritius rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
Malta ranks 146th and Mauritius ranks 148th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Mauritius: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/malta/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/malta/mauritius/">Malta vs Mauritius: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.