Papua New Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

Papua New Guinea
0 kt per person
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0 kt per person
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
153rd
Sri Lanka rank
154th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Sri Lanka
0000196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd and Sri Lanka ranks 154th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Sri Lanka
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Sri Lanka
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Sri Lanka
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Sri Lanka
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Papua New Guinea
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Papua New Guinea or Sri Lanka?
Papua New Guinea, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Papua New Guinea and Sri Lanka?
0 kt per person, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Sri Lanka rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd and Sri Lanka ranks 154th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/sri-lanka/">Papua New Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.