Bahamas vs Finland: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Bahamas
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
134th
Finland rank
137th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Bahamas
  • Finland
00000.001196119922023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 134th and Finland ranks 137th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 6 and Finland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Bahamas
1970s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Bahamas or Finland?
Bahamas, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Bahamas and Finland?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Finland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Finland rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Bahamas ranks 134th and Finland ranks 137th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Finland: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/finland/">Bahamas vs Finland: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.