Barbados vs Ethiopia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Barbados
0.0067 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ethiopia
0.0071 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
26th
Ethiopia rank
24th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Barbados
  • Ethiopia
00.0050.010.0150.020.025196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0.0071 kt per square kilometre against 0.0067 kt per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 26th and Ethiopia ranks 24th of 159 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0034 kt per square kilometre 0.0023 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0035 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.0064 kt per square kilometre 0.0052 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Barbados or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 0.0071 kt per square kilometre against 0.0067 kt per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Barbados and Ethiopia?
0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Ethiopia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Ethiopia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Barbados ranks 26th and Ethiopia ranks 24th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Ethiopia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/ethiopia/">Barbados vs Ethiopia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.