Barbados vs Serbia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Barbados
0.0067 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
0.0063 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
26th
Serbia rank
29th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Barbados
  • Serbia
0.0050.010.0150.020.025196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0067 kt per square kilometre against 0.0063 kt per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 26th and Serbia ranks 29th of 159 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0057 kt per square kilometre 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.0064 kt per square kilometre 0.0054 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0.0063 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Barbados or Serbia?
Barbados, at 0.0067 kt per square kilometre against 0.0063 kt per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Barbados and Serbia?
0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Serbia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Barbados ranks 26th and Serbia ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Serbia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/serbia/">Barbados vs Serbia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.