Barbados vs Turkmenistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Barbados
0.0067 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0066 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
26th
Turkmenistan rank
27th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Barbados
  • Turkmenistan
00.0050.010.0150.020.025196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0067 kt per square kilometre against 0.0066 kt per square kilometre in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 26th and Turkmenistan ranks 27th of 159 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0034 kt per square kilometre 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0056 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2010s 0.0064 kt per square kilometre 0.0065 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2020s 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0.0066 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Barbados or Turkmenistan?
Barbados, at 0.0067 kt per square kilometre against 0.0066 kt per square kilometre in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Barbados and Turkmenistan?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Turkmenistan rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Barbados ranks 26th and Turkmenistan ranks 27th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Turkmenistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/turkmenistan/">Barbados vs Turkmenistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.